Comparison of Long-term Response and Remission to Omalizumab and Anti-IL-5/IL-5R Using Different Criteria in a Real-life Cohort of Severe Asthma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of biologic therapy response is vital to monitor its effectiveness. Authors have proposed various response criteria including good responder, super-responder, non-responder, and clinical remission. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the prevalence of response and clinical remission after long-term treatment (>6 months) of anti-IgE and anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα biologics, compare these results with existing criteria, and identify predictors for non-responders and clinical remission. METHODS: A multicenter, real-life study involving severe asthma patients in Spain. Various outcomes were assessed to gauge response and clinical remission against established criteria. RESULTS: The study included 429 patients, 209 (48.7%) omalizumab, 112 (26.1%) mepolizumab, 19 (4.4%) reslizumab and 89 (20.7%) benralizumab, with a mean treatment duration of 55.3±38.8 months. In the final year of treatment, 218 (50.8%) were super-responders, 173 (40.3%) responders, 38 (8.9%) non-responders, and clinical remission in 116 (27%), without differences among biologics. The short-term non-responders (<6 months) were 25/545 (4.6%). Substantial variations in response and clinical remission were observed when applying different published criteria. Predictors of non-response included higher BMI (OR:1.14; 95% CI:1.06-1.23; p<0.001), admissions at ICU (2.69; 1.30-5.56; p=0.01), high count of SAE (1.21; 1.03-1.42; p=0.02) before biologic treatment. High FEV1% (0.96; 0.95-0.98; p<0.001), a high ACT score (0.93; 0.88-0.99; p=0.01) before biologic treatment or NSAID-ERD (0.52; 0.29-0.91; p=0.02) showed strong associations with achieving clinical remission. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of severe asthma patients treated long-term with omalizumab or anti-IL5/IL-5Rα achieved a good response. Differences in response criteria highlight the need for harmonization in defining response and clinical remission in biologic therapy to enable meaningful cross-study comparisons.

Disposition of Work-Related Asthma in a Spanish Asthma Cohort: Comparison of Asthma Severity Between Employed and Retired Workers.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to certain agents in the workplace can trigger occupational asthma or work-exacerbated asthma, both of which come under the heading of work-related asthma (WRA). Understanding the burden that WRA represents can help in the management of these patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of occupation on asthma in real life and analyze the characteristics of patients with WRA included in an asthma cohort. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study of a cohort of consecutive patients with asthma. A standardized clinical history was completed. Patients were classified as having WRA or non-WRA. All patients underwent respiratory function tests, FeNO test, and methacholine challenge (methacholine concentration that causes a 20% drop in FEV1) at the beginning of the study. They were classified into two groups, depending on their employment status: employed (group 1) or unemployed (group 2). RESULTS: Of the 480 patients included in the cohort, 82 (17%) received the diagnosis of WRA. Fifty-seven patients (70%) were still working. Mean age (SD) was 46 (10.69) years in group 1 and 57 (9.91) years in group 2 (P < .0001). Significant differences were observed in adherence to treatment (64.9% in group 1 vs 88% in group 2; P = .0354) and in severe asthma exacerbations (35.7% in group 1 vs 0% in group 2; P = .0172). No significant differences were observed in the rest of the variables analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of WRA in specialized asthma units is not negligible. The absence of differences in the severity of asthma, the treatment administered, alterations in lung function, and the number of exacerbations in those working versus not working may support the idea that advice regarding changing jobs should be customized for individual patients.

Identification of Asthma Phenotypes in the Spanish MEGA Cohort Study Using Cluster Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The definition of asthma phenotypes has not been fully established, neither there are cluster studies showing homogeneous results to solidly establish clear phenotypes. The purpose of this study was to develop a classification algorithm based on unsupervised cluster analysis, identifying clusters that represent clinically relevant asthma phenotypes that may share asthma-related outcomes. METHODS: We performed a multicentre prospective cohort study, including adult patients with asthma (N=512) from the MEGA study (Mechanisms underlying the Genesis and evolution of Asthma). A standardised clinical history was completed for each patient. Cluster analysis was performed using the kernel k-groups algorithm. RESULTS: Four clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (31.5% of subjects) includes adult-onset atopic patients with better lung function, lower BMI, good asthma control, low ICS dose, and few exacerbations. Cluster 2 (23.6%) is made of adolescent-onset atopic asthma patients with normal lung function, but low adherence to treatment (59% well-controlled) and smokers (48%). Cluster 3 (17.1%) includes adult-onset patients, mostly severe non-atopic, with overweight, the worse lung function and asthma control, and receiving combination of treatments. Cluster 4 (26.7%) consists of the elderly-onset patients, mostly female, atopic (64%), with high BMI and normal lung function, prevalence of smokers and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: We defined four phenotypes of asthma using unsupervised cluster analysis. These clusters are clinically relevant and differ from each other as regards FEV1, age of onset, age, BMI, atopy, asthma severity, exacerbations, control, social class, smoking and nasal polyps.

Characteristics of Induced-Sputum Inflammatory Phenotypes in Adults with Asthma: Predictors of Bronchial Eosinophilia.

Purpose: The objectives of this study were, for patients attending a specialist asthma clinic at a tertiary care hospital, to determine, from sputum induction (SI), proportions of bronchial inflammatory phenotypes, demographic, clinical and functional characteristics of each phenotype, and the most accessible non-invasive inflammatory marker that best discriminates between phenotypes. Patients and Methods: Included were 96 patients with asthma, attending a specialist asthma clinic at a tertiary care hospital, who underwent testing as follows: SI, spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood eosinophilia, total immunoglobulin E (IgE), and a skin prick test. Results: SI phenotypes were 46.9% eosinophilic, 33.3% paucigranulocytic, 15.6% neutrophilic, and 4.2% mixed. No significantly different clinical or functional characteristics were observed between the phenotypes. A positive correlation was observed between SI eosinophilia and both emergency visits in the last 12 months (p = 0.041; r = 0.214) and FeNO values (p = 0.000; r = 0.368). Blood eosinophilia correlated with SI eosinophilia (p = 0.001; r = 0.362) and was the best predictor of bronchial eosinophilia, followed by FeNO, and total blood IgE (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) 72%, 65%, and 53%, respectively), although precision was only fair. Conclusion: In consultations for severe asthma, the most frequent phenotype was eosinophilic. Peripheral blood eosinophilia is a reliable marker for discriminating between different bronchial inflammatory phenotypes, is useful in enabling doctors to select a suitable biologic treatment and so prevent asthma exacerbation, and is a better predictor of bronchial eosinophilia than FeNO and IgE values.

Identification of Two Eosinophil Subsets in Induced Sputum from Patients with Allergic Asthma According to CD15 and CD66b Expression.

Two subsets of eosinophils have been described: resident eosinophils with homeostatic functions (rEOS) in healthy subjects and in patients with nonallergic eosinophilic asthma, and inflammatory eosinophils (iEOS) in blood and lung samples from patients with allergic asthma. We explored if it would be possible to identify different subsets of eosinophils using flow cytometry and the gating strategy applied to induced sputum. We conducted an observational cross-sectional single-center study of 62 patients with persistent allergic asthma. Inflammatory cells from induced sputum samples were counted by light microscopy and flow cytometry, and cytokine levels in the supernatant were determined. Two subsets of eosinophils were defined that we call E1 (CD66b-high and CD15-high) and E2 (CD66b-low and CD15-low). Of the 62 patients, 24 were eosinophilic, 18 mixed, 10 paucigranulocytic, and 10 neutrophilic. E1 predominated over E2 in the eosinophilic and mixed patients (20.86% vs. 6.27% and 14.42% vs. 4.31%, respectively), while E1 and E2 were similar for neutrophilic and paucigranulocytic patients. E1 correlated with IL-5, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and blood eosinophils. While eosinophil subsets have been identified for asthma in blood, we have shown that they can also be identified in induced sputum.

Clinical and inflammatory characteristics of patients with asthma in the Spanish MEGA project cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The MEGA (MEchanism underlying the Genesis and evolution of Asthma) project is a multicenter cohort study carried out in eight Spanish hospitals, gathering clinical, physiological, and molecular data from patients with asthma and multimorbidities in order to gain insight into the different physiopathological mechanisms involved in this disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We report the baseline clinical and physiological characteristics and biomarker measures of adult participants in the project with the aim of better understanding the natural history and underlying mechanisms of asthma as well as the associated multimorbidities across different levels of severity. We carried out a detailed clinical examination, pulmonary function testing, measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood counts, induced sputum, skin prick tests, chest computed tomography scan, asthma questionnaires, and multimorbidity assessment in 512 asthmatic patients. RESULTS: When compared to patients with milder disease, severe asthmatic patients showed greater presence of symptoms, more exacerbations, lower asthma control, increased airflow obstruction, and higher frequency of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, severe rhinitis, anxiety and depression, gastroesophageal reflux, and bronchiectasis. CONCLUSION: The MEGA project succeeded in recruiting a high number of asthma patients, especially those with severe disease, who showed lower control and higher frequency of multimorbidities.

Recent Advances in Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy as Treatment for Allergic Asthma: A Practical Overview.

The Global Initiative for Asthma Report updated in 2019 stated that potential benefits of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), compared to pharmacological and avoidance options, must be weighed against the risk of adverse effects and the inconvenience and cost of the prolonged course of therapy in asthma. Thus, with the aim of clarifying some aspects with regard to the possible use of AIT in allergic asthma treatment armamentarium, a group of expert allergists from the Spanish Allergy and Clinical Immunology Scientific Society (SEAIC), particularly from the Immunotherapy and Asthma Interest Groups developed a frequently asked questions in clinical practice. This document updates relevant topics on the use of AIT in asthma and could facilitate physician clinical decisions and improve health outcomes for individual patients.

Recomendaciones de derivación del paciente adulto con crisis de asma desde el servicio de urgencias / Referral recommendations for adult emergency department patients with exacerbated asthma

El presente documento de consenso se ha desarrollado con el fin de proporcionar una herramienta útil para el manejo del paciente asmático que acude al servicio de urgencias (SU) con una crisis asmática. Incluye recomendaciones para tomar la decisión de alta o ingreso, así como indicaciones de derivación para el posterior seguimiento. Un equipo multidisciplinar, constituido por tres especialistas en medicina de urgencias, tres especialistas en neumología y tres especialistas en alergología, se encargó de elaborar una lista de preguntas clínicas que respondieron mediante la ayuda tanto de guías de práctica clínica, como de literatura disponible. Los contenidos y el reparto de tareas en diferentes grupos de trabajo se consensuaron en una reunión presencial. Los materiales resultantes se pusieron en común y sirvieron para la preparación del manuscrito final. Las recomendaciones y los algoritmos incluidos en el mismo van dirigidos a identificar y diagnosticar correctamente las exacerbaciones asmáticas en el SU y a establecer los criterios de hospitalización o alta. Se incluyen también las pautas para el tratamiento de los pacientes y para su derivación al ámbito de atención especializada en caso de alta, incluyendo los criterios de priorización para dicha derivación. El documento ha sido avalado por la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR), Sociedad Española de Alergología e Inmunología Clínica (SEAIC), y la Sociedad Española de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES)

This consensus paper's purpose is to provide a tool for managing emergency asthma exacerbations that require a decision to admit or discharge the patient. The paper also addresses where to refer the discharged patient for follow up. A multidisciplinary team of 3 emergency physicians, 3 specialists in respiratory medicine, and 3 allergy specialists were charged with drafting a list of clinical questions to answer by consulting practice guidelines and other resources in the literature. The specialists held a face-to-face meeting to distribute tasks and topics to working groups. The groups shared their reports, which provided the basis for drafting the final paper. The recommendations and flow charts included in the paper provide guidance for identifying and correctly diagnosing asthma exacerbations in the emergency department. Criteria for admission or discharge are incorporated. Treatment protocols and recommendations for referring discharged patients to specialists are addressed, along with criteria for priority referrals. The final consensus paper has been endorsed by the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR), the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), and the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES)

Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Nasal Polyposis in Asthma PATIENTS: Impact on Bronchial Inflammation / Cirugía endoscópica nasosinusal para la poliposis nasal en pacientes con asma: impacto en la inflamación bronquial

No disponible